My problem with d20 is that.well first I don't really like the system that much its too rules heavy and about a million books are needed to run it. There is of course a Black company game in d20 system (the books heavily influenced the Erikson esp. Anyways my group is really having fun with it at the moment, hope yours does.Ĭool, i didn't realise that there had been previous discussion about it (being new to the Forums and all) but most of what ye are saying makes sense. Sorcerers as hedge wizards, higher level druids as soletaken (that one kinda makes sense actually), fighters, barbarians, clerics as priests with access to high denul, and low denul is a cleric as well but without the healing domain, rogues (duh), rangers, anyways you get the point, the system isn't nearly as important as the setting, which with erikson is layered and i've found really helps verisimilitude. For example, we have a diviner specialist mage, which after some thought that translated to the warren of Serc, then instead of calling it 'magic missile' it was hailstones launched out of the warren. The system of specialist mages works awfully well for the warrens and characterizing the warren travel as the teleport spells(available at higher levels) has worked out rather well. I use the D&D deities and demigods system to run the ascendants and gods and it works rather well.
I use D&D 3.5 to run malazan adventures, the players have read the books but are having fun nonetheless.
0 kommentar(er)
